Is life really that bad that you need to do that?

I guess I’ll never understand.

It’s that time again…

I don’t consider myself a very girly person. I haven’t been shopping this whole last school year, blue is increasingly becoming my favorite color, and on my free time you’ll find me eating Cheetos and playing Fighter’s Destiny in my underwear. But right now I feel like painting my nails and letting my brain melt as I sift through a plethora of girly magazines. Oh, and perhaps watch One Tree Hill. (Thanks Sarah Lue)

SORRY I’M NOT SORRY

michaelpalin:

did you know if the black keys and the white stripes collaborated they’d make a fucking piano

(via phazes)

"What some of us want—those who aren’t blinded by a lot of bullshit persiflage thrown up to mask the idea that rich folks want to keep their damn money—is for you to acknowledge that you couldn’t have made it in America without America. That you were fortunate enough to be born in a country where upward mobility is possible (a subject upon which Barack Obama can speak with the authority of experience), but where the channels making such upward mobility possible are being increasingly clogged. That it’s not fair to ask the middle class to assume a disproportionate amount of the tax burden. Not fair? It’s un-f—king-American, is what it is. I don’t want you to apologize for being rich; I want you to acknowledge that in America, we all should have to pay our fair share. That our civics classes never taught us that being American means that—sorry, kiddies—you’re on your own. That those who have received much must be obligated to pay—not to give, not to “cut a check and shut up,” in Gov. Christie’s words, but to pay—in the same proportion."

Stephen King scolds the superrich (including himself—and Mitt Romney) for not giving back, and warns of a Kingsian apocalyptic scenario if inequality is not addressed in America. Stephen King FTW! (via cheatsheet)

(Source: thedailybeast.com, via newsweek)